Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory	2.3 GB free of 7 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110406
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '18 at 14:38
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 87 2-Core 163 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 406 42% 340 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 4.57 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 3.41 4% 4.36 fps	MRender 7.24 Gravity 5 Splatting 3.52 4% 5.25 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 55 (03) Spinup time 166 163 4675 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13393 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 50 50 37022 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8502 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1416 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13390 (C2) HDA temperature 107 88 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3555 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40.3% Average	Read 70.8 Write 69.4 Mixed 69.4 53% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.32 98% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 62%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 97GB free Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 88 88 4440 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5445 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 25 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 17598 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3746 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 47 471400476 (C2) HDA temperature 71 46 504954909 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1914 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 3 (C8) Write error rate 99 2 11204 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	44% Average	Read 74.7 Write 78.1 Mixed 78.5 58% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 109% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 0198 99U5471-003.A00LF 80AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 04CB 7GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.6% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P9900 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	23x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	15x
Core i5-750Intel $66Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	5x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $77Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GBBench 72%, 3,217 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 3 samples	3x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 6 samples	3x
HP698650-154-KEB 4x4GBUnknownBench 45%, 7 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $147

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16