HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory9.9 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '18 at 15:03
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 167
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 385
38% 310 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4550
AMD(1002 0104) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.1% Average
Read 262
Write 200
Mixed 215
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 13.7
66% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 55.2
56% 90.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDT721050SLA360 500GB-$66
446GB free
Firmware: ST3OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 99
Write 107
Mixed 104
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.47
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U6EFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6EFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.1% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback