ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-F2A85XM-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A85XM-D3H (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20121005
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '14 at 00:21
Run Duration	915 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 70.2 2-Core 126 45% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 236 30% 225 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 37% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D 7,665 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 9901) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.0.0 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	5.88% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 8.23 Parallax 7.16 6% 7.63 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 7.91 5% 6.42 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.88% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD8000AARS-00Y5B1 800GB 1,154 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 276GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 135 6050 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1108 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6976 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1106 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 176 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 65 65 405225 (C2) HDA temperature 112 103 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 199 126 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	48.7% Average	Read 101 Write 68.4 Mixed 73.6 61% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.16 66% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 298GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 178 4041 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1022 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6831 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 992 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 106 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 915 (C2) HDA temperature 108 98 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	51.9% Above average	Read 100 Write 80.7 Mixed 83.7 66% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.48 113% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 76%
Mass Storage Device 320GB 2,915 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 277GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 32.8 Mixed 11.5 31% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.26 38% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 20%
USB Flash Memory 32GB 520 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 28GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	4.81% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 5.08 Mixed 5.93 10% 9.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.44 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 17% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.81% Great: 21%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 9GB free, PID null Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 18.7 Write 12.1 Mixed 13.4 18% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.22 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 1.43 124% 2.48 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 12%
Multiple Card Reader 0GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	1.51% Terrible	Read 6.57 Write 1.66 Mixed 2.6 4% 3.61 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.04 4% 0.11 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.51% Great: 5%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-F2A85XM-D3H Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85XM-D3H

CPU
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	14x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	13x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples	8x
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	8x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
X1 50 120GBEmtecBench 57%, 14 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 2x4GBCorsairBench 40%, 3,295 samples	4x
HMT451U6AFR8A HMT451U6BFR8A HMT451U6BFR8A HMT451U6BFR8A 16GBHynixBench 33%, 8 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,425 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $495

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback