Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '18 at 14:57
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 138
61% 99 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 409
41% 334 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 453
Write 233
Mixed 127
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 10.3
62% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 61
DQ Mixed 26.6
39% 75 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 88%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
415GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 143
Write 153
Mixed 140
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.28
110% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
104GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 80.6
Write 88.5
Mixed 75
61% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.48
108% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
101GB free
Firmware: CR100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 51.1
Mixed 46.1
36% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.38
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135
53GB free
Firmware: STDOA39D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 62.7
Mixed 58
45% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.42
95% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 59%
Packard Bell Carbon 1TB
148GB free, PID 0017
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 28.3
Mixed 11.9
28% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.31
64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 20%
INTEL SS DSC2CT180A3 180GB
128GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 31.1
Write 29.2
Mixed 30.3
39% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.68
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 4.57
412% 6.32 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 79%
Initio 6L200P0 204GB
67GB free, PID 1040
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
Read 29.3
Write 29.8
Mixed 28.1
38% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.22
4K Mixed 0.34
123% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback