Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '19 at 20:36
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 130
61% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 442
43% 353 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.8% Good
Lighting 77.9
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 72.4
64% 76 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 72.5
59% 71.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 155 104 86 81 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 433
Write 384
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 134
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 26.8
90% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 108
117% 195 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135
179GB free
Firmware: STDOA39D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 67 67 63 62 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 83
Write 81
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 64.4
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 59%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
515GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 69 66 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 87
Write 89.2
Mixed 73
SusWrite 67.2
59% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
272GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 96.2
Write 99.2
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 58.9
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
154GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 55 49 53 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 57
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 53.6
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 44%
Packard Bell Carbon 1TB
576GB free, PID 0017
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.6 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.94% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 22.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 0.5
23% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.94%
Great: 20%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 11 12 11 12 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 5.7
Mixed 12
SusWrite 10.9
14% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 16%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
586GB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 36.3
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 33.8
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 128 120 124 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 93
Write 102
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 125
131% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
188% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 75%
INTEL SS DSC2CT180A3 180GB
166GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 26.7
Write 25.7
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 17.4
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 4.9
355% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 14.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback