Gigabyte GA-P45T-ES3G

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P45T-ES3G (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '18 at 10:54
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 115 57% 88.3 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 229 30% 228 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56% Above average	Lighting 70.5 Reflection 70.2 Parallax 91.4 57% 77.4 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 67.8 Splatting 59 53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5270688 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 850403529604 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5233 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 3469 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 85 51545178136 (C2) HDA temperature 24 85 51545178136 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5270688 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5270688 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5270688 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 81 81 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14311 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11841 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11841 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17505	59.6% Above average	Read 259 Write 207 Mixed 175 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 22.4 98% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 55.1 70% 126 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 439GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 188 171 1566 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2436 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1914 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1722 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1227 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3093 (C2) HDA temperature 117 99 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68% Good	Read 121 Write 116 Mixed 130 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.25 114% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 109%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 225GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 176 2100 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9731 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 13904 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8826 (BE) vendor-specific 70 30 30 (C2) HDA temperature 120 80 30 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.4% Below average	Read 60.7 Write 62.3 Mixed 60.1 46% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.44 104% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.6% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 8.4 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P45T-ES3G Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P45T-ES3G

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 97%, 11,302 samples	1x
PLUS 240 GB 240GBSandiskBench 43%, 24,911 samples	1x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	4x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $319

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16