Gigabyte GA-P45T-ES3G

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P45T-ES3G (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '18 at 00:38
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 92 1-Core 55.7 2-Core 112 56% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 218 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56% Above average	Lighting 70.6 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 89 58% 76.7 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 67.1 Splatting 58.5 53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5259178 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 -66408784325821 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5154 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 3420 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 85 51545178138 (C2) HDA temperature 26 85 51545178138 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5259178 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5259178 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5259178 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 81 81 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14179 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11764 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11764 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17354	52.7% Above average	Read 254 Write 184 Mixed 196 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 12.1 96% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 48.3 48% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 429GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 197 171 1133 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2322 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1848 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1642 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1177 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2933 (C2) HDA temperature 114 99 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.8% Excellent	Read 153 Write 135 Mixed 139 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.22 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.29 122% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 109%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 233GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 176 1216 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9597 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13840 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8747 (BE) vendor-specific 60 30 40 (C2) HDA temperature 110 80 40 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.4% Below average	Read 61.2 Write 61.5 Mixed 60.7 46% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.5 119% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.9% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 8.2 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P45T-ES3G Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P45T-ES3G

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 97%, 11,302 samples	1x
PLUS 240 GB 240GBSandiskBench 43%, 24,911 samples	1x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	4x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $319

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16