Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '18 at 13:10
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Memory 93.2 1-Core 142 2-Core 283 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 726 76% 608 Pts	64-Core 785 49% 785 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Lighting 47.2 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 39.7 38% 39.8 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 34.9 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB 14,802 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 372GB free Firmware: SAFM001B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13955 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 194 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 749 (AD) Unknown 100 100 393236 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 116 (C2) HDA temperature 74 55 193274576922 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3052 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2498 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3187 (F4) Unknown 100 100 6 (F5) Unknown 100 100 20 (F6) Unknown 100 100 875648	85.3% Excellent	Read 502 Write 475 Mixed 494 110% 490 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 13.7 90% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 14 70% 159 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 110%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 344GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1,439 Write 972 Mixed 1,128 262% 1,180 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 37.8 141% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 119 130% 222 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 254%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 69GB free Firmware: 526ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5334006 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 110543868294956 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 260 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 202 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 39 77311967262 (C2) HDA temperature 30 39 77311967262 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5334006 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5334006 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5334006 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 22467 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8356 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8356 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13003	77.3% Very good	Read 499 Write 220 Mixed 307 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 21.2 115% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 81.4 100% 178 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 94%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 166 6166 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12493 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 46 46 39861 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 253 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 113 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 12379 (C2) HDA temperature 117 95 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	47.2% Average	Read 63.5 Write 101 Mixed 118 72% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.19 84% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 77%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 197 176 7133 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13338 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27540 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 248 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 134 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 30059 (C2) HDA temperature 118 110 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	60.8% Good	Read 108 Write 103 Mixed 98.8 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 0.2 104% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 100%
WD Se 1TB (2013)-$18 2,236 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 850GB free Firmware: 01.01M02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 173 2216 (04) Start/Stop count 83 83 17450 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 31142 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 253 (10) Unknown 27 173 490913091078 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 91 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17358 (C2) HDA temperature 113 96 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.3% Very good	Read 156 Write 89.2 Mixed 86.6 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 0.23 4K Mixed 0.07 44% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 104%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 102GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 217 198 8150 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9836 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13493 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 194 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 124 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32597 (C2) HDA temperature 122 110 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 92.2 Mixed 89.3 71% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.2 85% 1 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 4x16GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	83% Excellent	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 26 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 27.3 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,000x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	253x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16