HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '18 at 01:09
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 523
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 506
Write 422
Mixed 269
88% 399 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 11.8
104% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 18.7
52% 109 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 91%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
297GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 64.5
Write 112
Mixed 103
71% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.31
55% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
297GB free
Firmware: 01.01S01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 63.8
Write 110
Mixed 83.4
65% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.23
45% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Kingston 9905403-496.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Ramaxel RMR5030EB68F9W1600 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback