Asus Z97-AR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-AR  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '18 at 01:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 276
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 725
78% 622 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1583 MHz, MLim: 1842 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Lighting 74.9
Reflection 77.2
Parallax 69.4
61% 73.8 fps
MRender 79.6
Gravity 70
Splatting 62.3
57% 70.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1SA754D117-820 240GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0815B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 303
Mixed 380
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 32.9
146% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 57.5
104% 205 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 96%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
767GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 167
Mixed 162
127% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.18
75% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
122GB free
Firmware: CP100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 60.9
Write 56.4
Mixed 61.4
45% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.31
76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 24.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-AR Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-AR - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $788
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback