Start START-DH61BF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemStart START-DH61BF  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH61BF
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '18 at 22:23
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 97
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 372
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36D5) 2GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 28.9
29% 31.7 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 30.2
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 35862 1TB
506GB free
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 208
Write 83.8
Mixed 108
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 5.57
4K Write 9.59
4K Mixed 4.82
20% 6.66 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 5.51
DQ Mixed 3.31
4% 6.58 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 54GB
22GB free (System drive)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 209
Write 85.2
Mixed 98
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 3.75
19% 6.56 MB/s
DQ Read 9.69
DQ Write 2.55
DQ Mixed 3.75
3% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF 04CD F3-1600C11-4GIS 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical START-DH61BF Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Start START-DH61BF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback