Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '18 at 01:13
Run Duration	438 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250 5,430 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 72.5 1-Core 131 2-Core 261 83% 155 Pts	4-Core 516 8-Core 1,021 91% 769 Pts	64-Core 2,130 132% 2,130 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Lighting 47.9 Reflection 32 Parallax 39 39% 39.6 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 41.8 Splatting 37.7 32% 39 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 336GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	270% Outstanding	Read 2,845 Write 1,489 Mixed 1,567 433% 1,967 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 52.9 164% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 126 138% 236 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 270% Great: 254%
Ocz-vert EX3 51GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 38GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: Unknown Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 525 Write 165 Mixed 244 68% 311 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 17.6 115% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 41 60% 112 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 68%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7505 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 18 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 18 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 19 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 141735034911 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 27 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 636 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7140 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 18 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 18 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 19 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 146029936672 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 27 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 631 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	87.5% Excellent	Read 176 Write 127 Mixed 178 122% 161 MB/s	4K Read 4.66 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.34 272% 2.38 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 109%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$89 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 373GB free Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 17752079 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 13218 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 256501988 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18484 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7444 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 12885164042 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 538902560 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 347 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 15126 (C2) HDA temperature 32 43 47244640288 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 21 17752079 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 20663087702192 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2023954403 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2339417743	49.9% Average	Read 86.2 Write 87.7 Mixed 84.3 65% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.52 117% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 73%
FLASH Drive AU_USB20 1GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Read 14 Write 3.38 Mixed 4.66 7% 7.35 MB/s	4K Read 7.03 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 28% 2.36 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.8% Above average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 15.3 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 9.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 Professional Gaming i9 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	18x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	18x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	20x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	9x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	8x
Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)WD $135Bench 121%, 28,136 samples	6x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	25x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	25x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,198

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16