Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171229
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '18 at 17:15
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 72.4 1-Core 134 2-Core 266 85% 157 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 999 90% 756 Pts	64-Core 1412 87% 1412 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 148 Parallax 126 110% 136 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 128 Splatting 107 94% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 477GB free Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 1,887 Write 1,735 Mixed 1,745 399% 1,789 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 46.8 164% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 149 149% 240 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 371GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8423 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1811 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 56 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 32 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9275249997	108% Outstanding	Read 523 Write 498 Mixed 517 115% 513 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 44.2 143% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 132 135% 220 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6771 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1373 (B1) Unknown 97 97 44 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 48 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 292 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27792339911	99.4% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 403 Mixed 416 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 42.8 140% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 110 117% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 37GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6515 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1699 (B1) Unknown 97 97 59 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 14 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8861671467	98.2% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 411 Mixed 419 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 39.1 134% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 103 116% 198 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 115%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239 995 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 5.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 30064771072 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 146030329890 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	124% Outstanding	Read 219 Write 214 Mixed 205 160% 213 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 2.89 4K Mixed 0.65 167% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$61 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 184326120 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2291 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 116350933 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 8974 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2042 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 71 71 29 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 34 34 66 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 504889374 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 51 51 98955 (C2) HDA temperature 30 50 73014444062 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 64 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 64 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 121929826570461 (F1) Unknown 100 253 59280142737 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1464896265869	83.4% Excellent	Read 158 Write 133 Mixed 139 108% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.16 72% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 229144488 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3917 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 10325024 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 6070 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1235 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 52 488177693 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 240 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 41279 (C2) HDA temperature 29 48 77309411357 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -59992103188195 (F1) Unknown 100 253 10790260914 (F2) Unknown 100 253 286737284345	93.2% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 146 Mixed 142 117% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.18 84% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83% Excellent	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 45.6 MC Mixed 26.5 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 9.5 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 95.9 42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 151%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	181x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	135x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	69x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,132

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16