Gigabyte GA-Z170N-WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z170N-WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170N-WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 27 '18 at 11:55
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 270
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 774
78% 635 Pts
64-Core 779
48% 779 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 37
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 34.7
30% 38.1 fps
MRender 52.9
Gravity 37
Splatting 48.3
38% 46 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS2754D117-514 480GB
299GB free
Firmware: CS211101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 414
Mixed 452
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 36.4
136% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 69.9
112% 212 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,320
Write 1,431
Mixed 1,443
382% 1,731 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 55.5
210% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 460
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 184
195% 326 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 262%
Great: 283%
PNY CS1311 120GB SSD
41GB free
Firmware: CS13 Max speed: Unknown
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 495
Write 326
Mixed 343
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 9.85
87% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 34.4
79% 164 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 106
Write 128
Mixed 128
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.19
106% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
863GB free
Firmware: 2BE10001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 66
Mixed 78.5
50% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.22
55% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM 003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
847GB free
Firmware: 2BE1 Max speed: Unknown
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 74.1
Write 101
Mixed 87
66% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.23
66% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 28.2
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 28.7
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170N-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170N-WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback