Foxconn MCP61M05

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFoxconn MCP61M05  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN M61PMV
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080708
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateMar 25 '18 at 19:18
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e
AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e«, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 69.7
37% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 68.1
8-Core 68.6
9% 68.3 Pts
64-Core 69.4
4% 69.4 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
EVGA(3842 1312) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.0
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 105
Write 94.1
Mixed 97.6
75% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.31
82% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MCP61M05 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn MCP61M05

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback