Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '18 at 04:20
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 87.6
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 103
59% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 190
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 0990) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.45 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 3.57
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 412
Mixed 418
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 33.6
141% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 22.1
44% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 115%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
74GB free
Firmware: CV23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 190
Mixed 156
135% 181 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.16
78% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Samsung HD161JJ 160GB
33GB free
Firmware: BW100-06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 42.7
Mixed 37.5
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.28
58% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback