Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 24 '18 at 15:20
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU
FM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 85.7
48% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 79.8
8-Core 76.2
11% 78 Pts
64-Core 68.3
4% 68.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 3.97
3% 3.82 fps
MRender 3.52
Gravity 3.67
Splatting 5.78
4% 4.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 222
Write 167
Mixed 170
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 14.9
68% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 98.4
DQ Write 51.4
DQ Mixed 28.9
34% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
112GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 96.6
Mixed 70.8
65% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.61
105% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB
540GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.84% Terrible
Read 30.6
Write 6.98
Mixed 11.3
16% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.21
29% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.84%
Great: 21%
WD My Book 500GB
217GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 29.1
Mixed 28.8
38% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.35
78% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
667, 667, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.7
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.2
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $154
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback