Asus G750JW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G750JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JW
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131211
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '16 at 19:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 192
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 497
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Asus(1043 119D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 21.2
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 14.7
13% 16 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
249GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 68.4
Write 80.3
Mixed 85.6
59% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.23
68% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JW Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback