Asus G750JZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus G750JZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JZA
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '18 at 14:20
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 187
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 507
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 157D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 6.53
4% 13 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 7.78
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 883
Write 377
Mixed 464
126% 575 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 18.9
106% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 47.1
72% 126 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 237%
Hitachi HTS541515A9E6300 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: KA0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 89.9
74% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-435.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 9905428-435.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.9
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JZA Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback