IGEL M330C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemIGEL M330C  (all builds)
MotherboardIGEL VX900
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '18 at 20:21
Run Duration432 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
VIA Eden X2 U4200
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 56
1-Core 10.7
2-Core 22.4
24% 29.7 Pts
4-Core 22.2
8-Core 22.7
3% 22.5 Pts
64-Core 20.5
1% 20.5 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
VIA Chrome9 HD IGP
Device(101B 1305) 128MB
Driver: VTGUModeDX32A.dll Ver. 8.14.14.181
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.27
0% 0.17 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA6C0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48% Average
Read 79.8
Write 87.8
Mixed 13
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.23
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48%
Great: 58%
VendorCo ProductCode 4GB
4GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Read 14.1
Write 5.32
Mixed 6.18
9% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 2.47
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.004
10% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 2.6
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 0.1
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback