Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '18 at 10:00
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 71.5
37% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 64.6
8-Core 69.1
9% 66.8 Pts
64-Core 74.8
5% 74.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
MSI(1462 2530) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Lighting 9.23
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 7.22
8% 8.51 fps
MRender 8.86
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 9.52
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G1G0A-00SS 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z331 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 239
Write 29.2
Mixed 23.1
21% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 1.19
31% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 41.2
DQ Mixed 0.25
9% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 34%
ITE Disk Array 0 123GB
92GB free
Firmware: YAR4 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 49.4
Write 41.6
Mixed 30.9
30% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.39
101% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Seagate ST340014AS 40GB-$50
7GB free
Firmware: 8.12 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 44.9
Write 46
Mixed 45.1
34% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.26
60% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston " 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback