Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS4 FX (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141013
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '17 at 16:21
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ 5,400 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 39.4 2-Core 73.6 39% 59.8 Pts	4-Core 72.9 8-Core 74.1 10% 73.5 Pts	64-Core 72.5 4% 72.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB CLim: 752 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.63% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 5.23 Parallax 3.62 4% 4.44 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 4.57 Splatting 3.17 4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.63% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G1G0A-00SS 120GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z331 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 243 Write 28.1 Mixed 14.1 20% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 0.17 30% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 19.2 DQ Mixed 1.71 6% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 34%
ITE Disk Array 0 123GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 92GB free Firmware: YAR4 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 55.9 Write 42.1 Mixed 47.9 37% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.51 128% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 28%
Seagate ST340014AS 40GB-$50 831 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 31GB free Firmware: 8.12 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 54 Write 54.2 Mixed 53.8 41% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.33 77% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston " 2x2GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.9% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 6.7 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	39x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	8x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	4x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	3x
PSD22G80026 PSD22G80026 4GBUnknownBench 22%, 22 samples	3x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 3,379 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $106

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16