Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1HQ

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1HQ (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '18 at 10:00
Run Duration	97 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 84 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 132 61% 98.8 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 197 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA33) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.62% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 8.46 Parallax 2.78 3% 5.08 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.7 4% 4.96 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.62% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM22.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 346 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 472 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 617 (AD) Unknown 100 100 524330 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1308	26% Poor	Read 488 Write 62.9 Mixed 112 47% 221 MB/s	4K Read 3.93 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 1.55 9% 2.41 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 16.9 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1HQ Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1HQ

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	12x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	8x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	4x

SSD
512GB 512GBSSDBench 87%, 6,819 samples	6x
V800/350G 360GBVasekyBench 63%, 133 samples	2x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	1x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 12GBMicronBench 41%, 11 samples	6x
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,182 samples	2x
99U5428-040.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 640 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16