MSI G41TM-P33 (MS-7592)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7592
MotherboardMSI G41TM-P33 (MS-7592)  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '18 at 10:19
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6500-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 98.5
48% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 97.6
13% 98.8 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
MSI(1462 7592) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.65
Parallax 0.75
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.62
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0.96
1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
272GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 76.3
Write 78.8
Mixed 32.4
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.36
98% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41TM-P33 (MS-7592) Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI G41TM-P33 (MS-7592)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback