Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120727
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '18 at 10:10
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 203
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 395
52% 388 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Palit(1569 11C6) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 23.2
14% 18.9 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 15
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 328
Write 289
Mixed 174
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 7.6
49% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 21.9
DQ Mixed 11.5
11% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 99%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
817GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 119
Write 152
Mixed 123
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 0.54
142% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 75%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00G9B0 500GB
305GB free, PID fcda
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 27.6
Mixed 7.3
26% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.28
63% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.5
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback