Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 22:21
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 109
2-Core 213
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 521
58% 454 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 1962) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 44.6
37% 45.1 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 36.4
32% 39 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
112GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 510
Write 143
Mixed 211
63% 288 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 14.8
93% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.9
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 9.87
30% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate 600 240GB-$215
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C675 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 491
Write 176
Mixed 243
66% 303 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 15.8
70% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 51.5
DQ Mixed 11.8
38% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $593
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback