Acer Veriton M498G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M498G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M498G
Memory7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 15 '18 at 12:24
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 163
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 211
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Dell(1028 2542) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 5.63
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 3.72
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.52
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 117
Write 66
Mixed 78.7
66% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.34
68% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 69%
Wl1.5tbs ATA 1.5TB
316GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 96.3
Write 77
Mixed 75.7
62% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.13
47% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 70%
Generic- SD/MMC 4GB
4GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Read 16.1
Write 8.71
Mixed 11.1
14% 12 MB/s
4K Read 3.13
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
13% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 80AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 10GB
1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M498G Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Acer Veriton M498G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $359
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback