Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180131
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '18 at 16:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 897
80% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,260
78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.1% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 110
Parallax 96.8
85% 103 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 99.3
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 414
Mixed 417
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 37.5
145% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 19.7
56% 119 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 134%
Lexar WorkflowCR1 64GB
19GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 334
Write 290
Mixed 313
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 5.16
36% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 5.12
7% 12 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 56%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 6TB
315GB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 105
Write 81.6
Mixed 74.5
107% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.32
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FBD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $987
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback