Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 UD4
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '18 at 23:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 788
79% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 134
Parallax 129
104% 130 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 119
Splatting 101
86% 105 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 484
Write 217
Mixed 284
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 9.87
50% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 11.6
DQ Write 34.1
DQ Mixed 9.26
11% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 103
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 25.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 10.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 UD4-CF Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $776
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback