Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '16 at 01:42
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 98.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 677
75% 594 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2888) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.7% Good
Lighting 91.2
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 102
74% 91.5 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 61.7
60% 76 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 60GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 452
Write 76.2
Mixed 129
47% 219 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 14
103% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 13
21% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 69%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
531GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 79.2
Write 62.4
Mixed 74
54% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.45
106% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 51%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
348GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 77.9
Write 76.4
Mixed 53.3
52% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.16
49% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MK8025GAL 80GB
50GB free, PID 2506
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.4% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 27.8
Mixed 28.7
37% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.23
43% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL7-2GBRM E30119A 04CD F3-12800CL7-2GBRM E30119A 8GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.3% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 24.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 25.5
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 41.7
96% 41.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $734
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback