Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock AB350M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '18 at 03:48
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 69.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 204 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 706 66% 547 Pts	64-Core 1,073 66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% PowerColor(148C 2390) 2GB CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 24.3 16% 24.4 fps	MRender 27.2 Gravity 17.2 Splatting 30.7 21% 25 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 16%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36ED) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 3.5 4% 3.93 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9021 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2063 (B1) Unknown 94 94 68 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 48 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 115 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17993214842
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 263GB free Firmware: GG2OA6C0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 218 218 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 64 64 57758 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 9905 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1493 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 154 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 70 70 302890 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 244814315542 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 52 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	53.4% Above average	Read 93.8 Write 92.3 Mixed 85.3 68% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 177GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 151567812 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3273 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 25885972770 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7221 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1411 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 7 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 54 454295575 (C2) HDA temperature 23 46 81604378647 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 29 20 151567812 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -134960757330981 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2390342653 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3855693164	50.9% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 87.7 Mixed 96.4 69% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.47 102% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-043.A00G 2x8GB 519 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 26.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 22 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	296x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	125x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	144x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	120x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	43x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	28x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $451

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16