Asus P5K/EPU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5K/EPU  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '18 at 12:13
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 90.9
48% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 180
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 35.8
31% 34.3 fps
MRender 44.1
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 36.4
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 405
Write 178
Mixed 256
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 6.39
73% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 7.4
34% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 72%
STT_FTM6 4GX25H 64GB
15GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 189
Write 113
Mixed 119
166% 141 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 4.64
474% 9.78 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K/EPU Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K/EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback