Today's hottest deals

Asus P5K/EPU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5K/EPU  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '18 at 19:43
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 90.5
49% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 176
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 35.8
31% 34.2 fps
MRender 44.2
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 36.6
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 410
Write 183
Mixed 255
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 3.81
63% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 7.62
22% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 72%
STT_FTM6 4GX25H 64GB
15GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 187
Write 119
Mixed 123
171% 143 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 7.48
4K Mixed 5.01
483% 9.44 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K/EPU Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K/EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback