Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive2.85% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '18 at 11:15
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 154
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 238
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
AMD(1002 0123) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 7.41
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 7.61
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-32 32GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150825 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Read 47.5
Write 4.77
Mixed 34.8
6% 29 MB/s
4K Read 1.43
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.14
2% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 29%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
136GB free
Firmware: HH100-06 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 51.2
Write 63.6
Mixed 33.1
37% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.36
73% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5458-011.A 99U5474-028.A 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-DS2 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback