Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive6.72% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '18 at 20:25
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 153
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 242
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
AMD(1002 0123) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 7.28
6% 7.64 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 7.65
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-32 32GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150825 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Read 80.9
Write 5.94
Mixed 30.3
8% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.43
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 0.13
12% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 29%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
140GB free
Firmware: HH100-06 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 61
Write 63.1
Mixed 53.3
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.35
75% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5458-011.A 99U5474-028.A 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-DS2 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback