MSI MS-16K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS63VR 7RG
MotherboardMSI MS-16K3  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170719
Uptime19.2 Days
Run DateMar 06 '18 at 13:51
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 58.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 191
65% 118 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 562
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11E9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.64% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 97.1
Parallax 6.59
6% 36.8 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 14.1
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512G8NY 512GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 455
Mixed 286
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 39.5
125% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 179
158% 239 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 100%
WD WD5000LPCX-22VHAT0 2TB
644GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
Read 73.8
Write 71.2
Mixed 50
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.2
90% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7D8MH-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16K3 Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16K3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback