HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory9.7 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '18 at 08:43
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 127
56% 90 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 243
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.5% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 50.2
46% 55.3 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 52.8
Splatting 60.7
45% 54.6 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
339GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 77.9
Write 83.1
Mixed 76.9
60% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.27
82% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 86.5
Write 76.4
Mixed 62.3
56% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.26
75% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 58%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
180GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 25.6
Mixed 26.4
34% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.18
58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 21%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-00ZCT0 320GB
147GB free, PID 0379
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 14.1
28% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.35
71% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 18.2
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback