Acer Aspire xxxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire xxxx  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire xxxx
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '18 at 20:55
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 87.3
1-Core 40
2-Core 70.8
46% 66 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 155
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Acer(1025 0347) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 5.27
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 4.25
4% 5.15 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 5.22
4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAC90 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 76
Write 78.2
Mixed 67.9
56% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.05
8% 0.04 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 58%
ST925031 5AS 250GB
4GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 15.6
Mixed 24.2
28% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.26
45% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 802C 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 6GB
1334, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire xxxx Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire xxxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback