Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '18 at 14:04
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 82.1 1-Core 119 2-Core 239 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 912 81% 688 Pts	64-Core 1,312 81% 1,312 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3792) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2222 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 154 Parallax 144 109% 144 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 137 Splatting 118 99% 121 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2735 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 851 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 48 (AE) Unknown 100 100 231 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 54 197569478683 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 8 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 12293011271 (F7) Unknown 100 100 386467620 (F8) Unknown 100 100 213044816 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1249 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	74.9% Very good	Read 471 Write 328 Mixed 334 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 21.4 92% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 39.6 70% 138 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 95%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 17GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12263 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4249 (B1) Unknown 88 88 139 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 52 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 75 75 25132 (EB) Unknown 99 99 631 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25463470869	64.7% Good	Read 501 Write 131 Mixed 99.7 52% 244 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 10.1 98% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 27.9 67% 144 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 8GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11020 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3207 (B1) Unknown 94 94 69 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 87 87 12745 (EB) Unknown 99 99 419 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17262602740	88% Excellent	Read 495 Write 351 Mixed 346 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 23.5 126% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 68.7 91% 167 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 10333112 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1032 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3295732 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1376 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 454 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 77 70 387317783 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 20 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3542 (C2) HDA temperature 23 40 73014444055 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -25984552139762 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8388134773 (F2) Unknown 100 253 17495969640	93.2% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 160 Mixed 134 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.21 86% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171 37,802 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 41.9 MC Write 37.7 MC Mixed 32.3 107% 37.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 27.7 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)