Intel DQ57TM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemINTEL_ DQ57TM__
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100615
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateMar 01 '18 at 22:01
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 680-$300
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 171
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 226
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.82
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.04% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 8.92
Parallax 9.5
8% 9.56 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 9.83
Splatting 13.8
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 193
Write 115
Mixed 107
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 11.2
61% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 34.5
DQ Mixed 11.7
14% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 114%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
745GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 16.5
Mixed 18.9
24% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.18
57% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP497157-D88-ELFWG M378B5673FH0-CH9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 RMR1870EF48E8W1333 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 13.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ57TM Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DQ57TM - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $573
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback