ACER Aspire X1900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemACER Aspire X1900  (all builds)
MotherboardACER Aspire X1900
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '18 at 00:02
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 70.5
35% 54.3 Pts
4-Core 71.8
8-Core 68.1
9% 69.9 Pts
64-Core 74.2
5% 74.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 0390) 783MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.59 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.78
1% 0.72 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 79.9
Write 83.3
Mixed 48.5
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.12
24% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF680F-ELD 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1900 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ACER Aspire X1900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback