ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7751
Motherboard	MSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751) (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131030
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '14 at 04:43
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 104 2-Core 210 71% 157 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 414 55% 413 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Zotac(19DA 3255) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4411 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Lighting 60.4 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 68.3 49% 61.2 fps	MRender 72.6 Gravity 51.7 Splatting 52.9 48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3541 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1568 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 56 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 111 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3367364878	83.3% Excellent	Read 507 Write 351 Mixed 354 90% 404 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 21.6 102% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 83.5 107% 196 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 586GB free Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 90347424 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2414 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 42059629 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5295 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2348 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 68 55 555614240 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 275 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3262 (C2) HDA temperature 32 45 47244640288 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -64244120808294 (F1) Unknown 100 253 10550888159 (F2) Unknown 100 253 13900014382	105% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 177 Mixed 169 134% 179 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.32 94% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 263GB free Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 80817048 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2577 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 28156145 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5343 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2379 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 555614240 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 318 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4374 (C2) HDA temperature 32 44 42949672992 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 8194797606029 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13925704257 (F2) Unknown 100 253 11368522520	76.6% Very good	Read 150 Write 118 Mixed 125 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.25 69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD032 320GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 83GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 39.7 Mixed 9.58 35% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.2 20% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z77 MPower (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751) - $444

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	230x
Core i5-3570KIntel $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	138x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	65x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	41x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	19x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	11x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $895

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback