Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD4H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '18 at 04:01
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 183
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 527
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 23% Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
192GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 326
Write 182
Mixed 193
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 16.1
88% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 53.8
76% 141 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
192GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 325
Write 188
Mixed 200
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 14.8
88% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 49.5
74% 139 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 73%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 717
Write 276
Mixed 372
100% 455 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 22.4
102% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 57
86% 156 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 374
Write 292
Mixed 292
240% 320 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 3.81
4K Mixed 0.66
858% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 193%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 131
Write 134
Mixed 117
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.78
135% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25
112GB free
Firmware: 0203
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 37.4
Write 41.7
Mixed 39.5
30% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.32
75% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 31%
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 26.3
Write 8.02
Mixed 11
16% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5403-048.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5403-048.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback