Lenovo 90DD00BYUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90DD00BYUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory37.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '18 at 01:33
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 249
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 705
73% 589 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60% Good
Lighting 75.9
Reflection 77.7
Parallax 65
62% 72.9 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 72.1
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV128HCGR-000L1 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L0QBXV7
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 722
Write 146
Mixed 228
79% 365 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 23.9
148% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 544
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 86.5
132% 261 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 107%
Lacie d2 Thunderbolt 3 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1153
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 69%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 95.7
Mixed 83.4
71% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.23
74% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
380GB free
Firmware: CC63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 160
Mixed 134
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.29
102% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-16GVR Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 0420 F4-2133C15-16GVR Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 23
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90DD00BYUS Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 90DD00BYUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback