Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111122
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '18 at 15:21
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 595
65% 514 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1315 MHz, MLim: 1493 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: BETA
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 6.47
4% 5.42 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 4.43
Splatting 5.09
4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0503A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 488
Write 363
Mixed 428
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 17.3
76% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 16.3
34% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 97%
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57
43GB free
Firmware: S8FM05.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 504
Write 100
Mixed 167
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 9.52
55% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 93.6
DQ Mixed 28
45% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
888GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69% Good
Read 124
Write 117
Mixed 93.2
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.48
114% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 52.6
76% 52.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback