PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3048h |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090825 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Feb 21 '18 at 18:39 |
Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 78% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
40%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GT 1030
PNY(196E 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP1OA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 97x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 81x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 205x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 37x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 27x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 12x |
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples | 6x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $116 |