Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '18 at 22:16
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 94 2-Core 185 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 364 49% 364 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 62.1 55% 66.4 fps	MRender 74 Gravity 63.6 Splatting 58.1 53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9915508 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -47897475279604 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1016 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 52 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 44 51542491162 (C2) HDA temperature 26 44 51542491162 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9915508 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9915508 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9915508 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7745 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4135 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4135 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8230 (F4) Unknown 98 98 5242954	39.3% Below average	Read 348 Write 102 Mixed 142 43% 197 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 10.1 60% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 52.8 DQ Mixed 9.21 15% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 566GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 145 145 25797788010 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 761 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1561 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 268 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 761 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 761 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 188979544098 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.1% Good	Read 116 Write 121 Mixed 143 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.24 96% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 21GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 169 2216 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2023 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7339 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1314 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 106 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1924 (C2) HDA temperature 113 101 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.3% Excellent	Read 137 Write 150 Mixed 105 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.28 86% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 15.9 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $200Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	30x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	29x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	20x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
PSD34G133381 2x4GBPatriotBench 44%, 873 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16