Asrock AD2550B-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock AD2550B-ITX (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131004
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '18 at 08:20
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D2550 408 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 42.2 1-Core 7.6 2-Core 13.8 17% 21.2 Pts	4-Core 12.9 8-Core 18.8 2% 15.8 Pts	64-Core 23.6 2% 23.6 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7961 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 30 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1921488783	35.5% Below average	Read 195 Write 145 Mixed 168 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 13.9 59% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 22 DQ Write 23.8 DQ Mixed 10.2 11% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 158GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7956 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 30 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 59 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 780911995	34.9% Below average	Read 206 Write 156 Mixed 175 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 10.2 54% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 34.1 DQ Mixed 11.6 13% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 124%
Imation Nano Pro 16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 063a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	6.72% Terrible	Read 23.4 Write 8.78 Mixed 9.73 15% 14 MB/s	4K Read 5.51 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.03 23% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.72% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM3X2GSD1066 2x2GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 2.4 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock AD2550B-ITX

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)