Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '18 at 16:44
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 96
2-Core 163
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 496
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
Nvidia(10DE 095B) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.3% Average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 48
53% 49.6 fps
MRender 49.4
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 34.4
33% 41.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-256 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VRDC Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 456
Write 332
Mixed 390
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 27.3
102% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 81.5
106% 192 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 89%
Toshiba MK6465GS 640GB
499GB free
Firmware: 2C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 79.8
Write 77.9
Mixed 66
56% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.25
75% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
476GB free
Firmware: JC4A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 93.5
Mixed 97.9
74% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.52
103% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 32.9
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,689 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $262
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback