| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
79.1%
Very good
|
80% 143 Pts
|
60% 470 Pts
|
34% 551 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Zotac(19DA 1207) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 390.65
|
20.9%
Poor
|
20% 30.2 fps
|
22% 27.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
68.7%
Good
|
70% 318 MB/s
|
75% 28 MB/s
|
78% 185 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
86.9%
Excellent
|
112% 503 MB/s
|
113% 40.2 MB/s
|
27% 46.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905403-558.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
51.6%
Above average
|
50% 17.3 GB/s
|
50% 17.7 GB/s
|
55% 72.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,289 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Disqualified System: bin bin
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 2,026x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 1,570x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 934x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,322x |
| SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples | 1,143x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 1,041x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |